Evaluation of the DSM-5 severity ratings for anorexia nervosa in a clinical sample.
About this resource
We examined the validity and utility of the DSM-5 severity ratings for anorexia nervosa (AN) in a clinical (treatment-seeking) sample (Nÿ=?273; 95.6% women). Participants classified with mild, moderate, severe, and extreme severity of AN based on their measured body mass index, differed significantly from each other in eating disorder features, putative maintenance factors, and illness-specific functional impairment (medium effect sizes). However, they were statistically indistinguishable in psychiatric-disorder comorbidity and distress, demographics, and age-of-AN onset. The implications of our findings, providing limited support for the DSM-5 severity ratings for AN, and directions for future research are outlined.
Feeling fat in eating disorders: Testing the unique relationships between feeling fat and measures of disordered eating in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa
Although widely discussed in theories of eating disorders, the experience of ?feeling fat?Read more
Attentional bias is more predictive of eating behavior after self-control exertion
There is experimental evidence to suggest thatÿattentional biasÿto food stimuli may predict food intake.Read more
Emotional eating and temperamental traits in Eating Disorders: A dimensional approach.
Growing evidence shows that temperamental features and emotional dysregulation are linked to Eating Disorders (EDs).Read more
Acceptance and psychological change at the higher levels of care: A naturalistic outcome study
This naturalistic outcome study reports on psychological change among a large (Nÿ= 617), transdiagnostic sample of eating disordered adults treated at higher levels of care at a private facility.Read more